THE LEAST EVANGELIZED ....
THROUGH THE EYES OF ST. PAUL, APOSTLE TO THE NATIONS
An Appreciation of Luther's Commentary on Galatians
In the weeks ahead I will take up issues relating to the hermeneutic described above - its background, foundations, challenges, interpretations, and more. But before that, I wish to give an appreciation of Martin Luther and his second commentary on Galatians. In the future I may move slightly away from his interpretation, but ever so respectfully. And so before those thoughts come out, an appreciation.
In my late teens and early 20's I was on a deliberate spiritual quest. I wanted to know God, all about Him, how to know Him, how He communicates, everything. Soon into the quest I despaired of hearing, seeing, knowing, relating to God, and I went deeply into Eastern philosophy, especially into Hindu mysticism. That path renounced this world and opened up on the world-soul, its substitute for a personal God.
Then one night I met up with Peter Doyle. Peter had been a Th.D. student under Karl Barth with John Rodgers, who was later also to become a close friend. Peter spoke to me of God's Incarnation, of the holy God and His love and power, of forgiveness and reconciliation offered through meeting God at the cross of His Son Jesus Christ.
Sensing where I was spiritually, Peter led me to Luther's commentary on Galatians, the one from 1535. I was working for a committee of the Senate and had hours at night when I could study. This was just before entering Seminary and while courting Constance - to whom Peter and Sally Anne introduced me!
There in those pages I found kindred spirits, two of them.
First, there was the apostle Paul, struggling with the burden of the Law, striving to find God's peace and approval by his rigorous obedience of the Law. Finally Paul saw the Light, found the righteousness of God in Christ, received imputed righteousness by through faith, and knew that the bonds of his sins had been nailed to the cross. In that justification he had peace.
And there was Luther, in a similar struggle. He was under the burden of the works of righteousness prescribed by the Catholic teaching of the day. His confessors dreaded Luther's confessions, for he knew his every sin and thought only by confessing each and every one would he satisfy the justice of the God he served. Then he too found the righteousness of God in Christ offered to sinners.
Over and over I read Luther's coming into the Light in his comments on the last verses of Paul's illumined heart at the end of chapter 2. For I was seeing the Light through what Luther held as reflected from Paul's liberation. The hope I saw was that God knew me as a sinner but nevertheless offered me the sanction of the blood of the cross, and forgiveness and a personal relationship as redeemed child of heaven. No longer did I sit in front of a wall seeking transcendence (the wall of a rectory where I was dog-sitting!), no longer the chants and meditation, no longer looking of the key in my dreams. The "alien righteousness" not my own had come from heaven to me. That is what Luther gave me, through Peter Doyle, through the apostle Paul.