THE LEAST EVANGELIZED ....
THROUGH THE EYES OF ST. PAUL, APOSTLE TO THE NATIONS
JUSTIFICATION AND MISSION
Last week I referred to scholarship on the Judaism of Paul's day. The inquiry addressed the religious outlook of the Jew at the time of Paul. The prevailing assumption has been handed down by Martin Luther, whose interpretation hinged on the antithesis of Law and Gospel, of works and grace.
The spokesman for a new perspective whom I read most, is James D. G. Dunn, professor of New Testament at the University of Durham, England. Dunn is very careful to state the implications of his views in cautious and conservative terms. He maintains that his view should be taken "in addition" to that of Luther, not discarding or replacing but adding to that of Luther.
I will skip over some of the foundational scholarship, coming back to it next week. What I will do here is to lay out two very significant implications that Dunn sees as deriving from the truth of justification by faith.
He would direct our attention to Ephesians 2 and Galatians 2. In each he sees the power of this truth drawing us to deeper unity in the church. In Ephesians Paul is addressing the wall that exists between Jew and Gentile, and that Christ has removed that wall. How? By setting aside the sin of Jew in the same way He sets aside the sin of the Gentile - by faith in Him. He needs to deal with each in the same way, so each is on equal footing before God and before each other. The human wall is torn down by divine grace, equally administered.
In Galatians 2, the incident is Peter's refusal to sit with Gentile This practice had been drummed into him since his childhood in his Jewish home in the Roman town of Bethsaida. Paul argued to his face that Peter knew that Jew and Gentile had equal status before God because they were justified by the same cross. The sin of Jew was removed in the very same way that the sin of Gentile was removed. Any legitimate separation within the church has been removed. There can, therefore, be no division within the Body of Christ. Jew and Gentile must sit together, symbolically and literally.
A second place where justification leads is actually missed by Dunn - and by most of the other scholars writing from this angle. That is the mission imperative that naturally and forcefully emerges from the logic of justification by faith.
It goes like this. How did God deal with me, a Gentile sinner? In the same way He dealt with Jewish sinners - by forgiveness through faith in Jesus Christ and His atoning sacrifice. So what does that say about sinners who haven't heard of Christ? Does that set them apart for a different covenant or for no covenant? Why should it? Does the fact that they haven't heard mean that they are not intended for God's covenant? No, God wants them to have the same opportunity to receive forgiveness as He as given me, and for the same reason.
Then what should be the response of the Church to them? We have a choice here. We can see us as special - heard, received, believing, growing, and obviously set apart. In that case we need do nothing. Or we can see us as no different from them - same degree of sin, same unworthiness of grace, same need of heaven's grace. The only difference is the opportunity to hear.
And that is the missions imperative that comes with justification by faith.
Rev. Tad de Bordenave
Founding Director, Anglican Frontier Missions
101 Starboard Court
Heathsville, VA 22473 USA
tadpole@mac.com www.AFM-US.org